Free Download All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism, by James E. Dolezal
When it needs factors to consider to choose such book to review in referring to the significant trouble that you have now, you should attempt with this publication. All That Is In God: Evangelical Theology And The Challenge Of Classical Christian Theism, By James E. Dolezal, nonetheless, ends up being a proffered book does not imply that this book is rarely attentively. You can transform your mind approached the best publication will certainly include one of the most hard language and also words to comprehend. This instance will certainly make nonsense for some individuals.
All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism, by James E. Dolezal
Free Download All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism, by James E. Dolezal
Why finding out more publications will provide you a lot more potential customers to be successful? You know, the a lot more you check out guides, the more you will acquire the incredible lessons and expertise. Lots of people with numerous publications to complete read will act various to individuals that don't like it so much. To offer you a better thing to do everyday, All That Is In God: Evangelical Theology And The Challenge Of Classical Christian Theism, By James E. Dolezal can be picked as friend to invest the leisure time.
When reading the title, you can see how the author is very reliable in using the words to create sentences. It will be also the ways how the author creates the diction to influence many people. But, it's not nonsense, it is something. Something that will lead you is thought to be better. Something that will make your feel so better. And something that will give you new things. This is it, the All That Is In God: Evangelical Theology And The Challenge Of Classical Christian Theism, By James E. Dolezal
This is not only about the perfections that we will provide. This is also regarding exactly what things that you can interest in to earn much better principle. When you have different concepts with this book, this is your time to satisfy the impacts by reading all content of guide. All That Is In God: Evangelical Theology And The Challenge Of Classical Christian Theism, By James E. Dolezal is also one of the windows to reach and open the world. Reading this book could aid you to find brand-new globe that you could not discover it previously.
Interested? Of course, this is why, we suppose you to click the link web page to go to, then you can delight in guide All That Is In God: Evangelical Theology And The Challenge Of Classical Christian Theism, By James E. Dolezal downloaded and install until completed. You can conserve the soft data of this All That Is In God: Evangelical Theology And The Challenge Of Classical Christian Theism, By James E. Dolezal in your device. Certainly, you will bring the gizmo anywhere, won't you? This is why, whenever you have extra time, every time you can enjoy reading by soft copy book All That Is In God: Evangelical Theology And The Challenge Of Classical Christian Theism, By James E. Dolezal
Review
Very few volumes of theology have stirred my profound intrigue as James Dolezal's All That Is in God. The book describes the heart of classical theology in its brilliant defense of the catholic view of the nature and character of God. It also chronicles the contemporary drift among some evangelical and Reformed scholars away from the orthodox understanding of God's simplicity and immutability. A must read.-- R.C. Sproul                 All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism offers an exceptionally clear, concise, and compelling presentation of what, until recently, catholic Christians have believed and confessed regarding the being and perfection of the triune God. It also offers incisive analysis of much contemporary evangelical teaching about God, concluding that both conservative and progressive "theistic mutualists" share common assumptions and fallacies regarding the being and activity of God. I know of no other contemporary book that makes both of these contributions together in one place, and certainly not with the degree of clarity, charity, and persuasiveness that Dolezal's book exhibits. A worthy book that deserves a wide readership! -- Scott R. Swain, President and James Woodrow Hassell Professor of Systematic Theology, Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando The road to doctrinal decline is not a steep cliff, but a gradual descent. Before we realize it, we have altered or abandoned long-cherished beliefs and doctrine. James Dolezal sounds the alarm on the important but forgotten doctrine of divine simplicity. He calls the church back to its traditional understanding and creedal affirmations not because he fears change, but because they are biblical. This book is well worth the time to read, digest, and reinvigorate our understanding of the simplicity of God. -- J. V. Fesko, Professor of Systematic and Historical Theology, Westminster Seminary California This is a significant book on a topic that could hardly be more important. What we believe about the nature of God matters, and we dare not risk having an underdeveloped or sub-biblical understanding of such a central Christian concern. To put it as plainly as possible: I want every one of our students to read this book and to reflect deeply on its teachings, since what Dolezal seeks to explain is nothing less than the historic doctrine of the Christian church. -- Jonathan L. Master, Professor of Theology and Dean of the School of Divinity, Cairn University
Read more
From the Back Cover
"This is an important book. It deserves close attention from teachers, pastors, and students, indeed, from anyone confronted by the confused mass of misleading theologies put forth today under the guise of new and relevant reconstructions of the evangelical and Reformed faith."-- From the foreword by Richard A. Muller, P. J. Zondervan Professor of Historical Theology, Emeritus, Calvin Theological Seminary "All That Is in God is a fine sequel to the author's God without Parts (2011). The chapters provide an excellent guide to the main contours of classical theism. Dr. Dolezal also sounds a timely warning to those who have been tempted to modify this theism in the interests of what he aptly calls 'theistic mutualism.' The result is an excellent, up-to-date reminder of the Christian doctrine of God as understood by the conciliar statements and by the mainstream Reformed confessions."-- Paul Helm, Teaching Fellow, Regent College
Read more
See all Editorial Reviews
Product details
Paperback: 176 pages
Publisher: Reformation Heritage Books (July 13, 2017)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1601785542
ISBN-13: 978-1601785541
Product Dimensions:
5.4 x 0.6 x 8.4 inches
Shipping Weight: 8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.5 out of 5 stars
24 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#88,016 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Over the past two years, debate between Confessionalists and Biblicists has gone back and forth regarding the position argued by Biblicists over the eternal submission of the Son to the Father. As has become clear, the Biblicists reject the normative value of creeds and confessions when it comes to the doctrine of God.James Dolezal widens the scope of the debate from a question if authority and submission to a larger issue: what kind of God do we worship? The Biblicists answer, ignoring/rejecting the historic confessions of the Church, is dangerously inadequate.In short, without the confessional safeguards, specifically the belief in God's simplicity, the center cannot hold. While it is not the purpose of the Biblicists to undermine the Church's historical teaching on the nature of God, they have made some massive mistakes.The book is concise and well-organized. While dealing with a complex subject, it should be accessible to most pastors and concerned laymen. Probably as a result of its compact nature (150 pages) it does not flesh out all the nuances of opinion between the evangelical supporters of divine mutability.In the seriously erring category, based on this work, I believe the author is convinced that Bruce Ware and Rob Lister are most problematic. Following them is John Frame. Beyond those three, the work implies that there are quite a few modern theologians who have absorbed the mindset, but who have not chased the rabbit out of the fence.Worth your time, even if John Frame doesn't like it.
An intermural debate of recent vintage among mostly Calvinistic/Reformed theologians centers on the Godhead. On the one side sits classical theism, which James Dolezal, assistant professor of theology in the School of Divinity at Cairn University, champions. On the other side sits theistic mutualism, backed to various degrees by Bruce Ware, Wayne Grudem, John Frame, Al Plantinga, John Feinberg, Scott Oliphant, J. I. Packer, D. A. Carson and Cornelius Plantinga, among others. Dolezal makes a case that classical theism has been the historic view of the church and has been taught by everyone from Augustine to the Puritans to John Gill. At risk, the author believes, is the very nature and essence of God. The stakes could not be higher.Classical theism teaches that God “does not derive any aspect of His being from outside Himself and is not in any way caused to be†(p. 1). Theistic mutualism would agree but promotes the idea that “God is involved in a genuine give-and-take relationship with His creatures†(p. 2). As a result, on the basis of the incarnation, “God changes–taking on new attributes and changing in some respect in relation to creation or to human events without, however, being altered essentially†(p. x). Taken to extreme this can lead to Open Theism, but Dolezal targets a softer version held by numerous modern evangelicals of note (pp. 3-4). These evangelicals maintain that God can be ontologically and ethically immutable and at the same time be relationally mutable (p. x). Dolezal believes the mutualists have lost the understanding of God’s being (p. 34) and abandoned God’s simplicity and infinite pure actuality of being (p. xiii). The motivation behind mutualistic theism, as the author sees it, is “the belief that any meaningful relationship between God and man must involve God in a transaction wherein He receives some determination of being from His creatures†(p. 34). Some examples: D. A. Carson views God as a personal being who interacts with people (p. 24); Bruce Ware contends that God’s involvement with creation “includes innumerable changes both on the part of God and on the part of His creatures†(p. 24); K. Scott Oliphint states, “God freely determined to take on attributes, characteristics, and properties that he did not have, and would not have, without creation†(p.94). In order for God to relate to His creatures, He must, in some sense, experience time (pp. 81, 89-97).Dolezal is not buying any of this and accuses the mutual theist of undermining the very nature of God and wrecking His immutability, impassibility and primarily His simplicity. In the process the very Trinity is in danger of being unraveled (pp. 119-134).At the root of Dolezal’s concern is the largely ignored doctrine of simplicity. While seldom mentioned by most modern theologians Dolezal positions it as the lynchpin to our understanding about God, which is why he devotes chapter three to simplicity and references it throughout the book. A simple God means that He is without parts. Therefore, “His act of existence is not what He has, but what He is†(p. 41) and “if all that is in God is God, then each of His attributes is identical with His essenceâ€â€”that is, there is no distinction between His essence and attributes (p. 42). The author believes that every current heresy begins by being wrong about simplicity (p. 40). His concerns run deep:"Without simplicity, God is open to the acquisition of being in addition to His essence and thus is not immutable. Without simplicity, it is not clear why God could not experience temporal change and thus fail to be timelessly eternal. Without simplicity, it is impossible that God be in every way infinite as there must be parts in Him, and parts by definition must be finite. Moreover, that which is built of parts cannot be infinite since the finite cannot aggregately yield the infinite" (p. 136).Dolezal believes the mutual theists, for any number of reasons, have lost simplicity and thus are in error about God. Simplicity has been disregarded by some who distinguish between attributes that belong to His essence, and those He acquires through relation with His creatures (pp. 61-67). Others deny divine simplicity by claiming it is not a biblical doctrine at all (pp. 67-71). Still others distort it (pp. 71-78). Much of our problem, as Dolezal admits, is that simplicity is not based on biblical proof texts but on reason, deduction and Aristotle’s metaphysical framework (pp. 44, 55). As many past philosophers and theologians abandoned the Aristotelian metaphysics, simplicity was minimized with it. “Indeed,†Dolezal complains, “many Christian theologians and ministers retreated from the field of metaphysics altogether and retrenched themselves in their Bibles, assuming that the Bible’s teaching could be successfully preserved without committing oneself to a particular understanding of being†(p. 63). It seems like a strange argument to admit that an attribute of God, in fact the most important aspect of His actuality, is not drawn from Scripture but from deductions based on Aristotelian metaphysics. It is hard to fault John Feinberg who “suggests that the lack of explicit biblical data for divine simplicity ‘should be disconcerting at the least, and a good argument against it at most’†(p. 69). Feinberg concludes that simplicity is not one of the divine attributes at all (p. 69). Dolezal retorts that Scripture teaches that God is incomprehensible in His being, an argument He uses often (pp. 38, 97, 102), and therefore it is not surprising that simplicity is hard to grasp. Another favorite argument used by the author is that of biblical language. When it comes to descriptions of God that seem to call into question simplicity, Dolezal turns to anthromorphism, analogies, and metaphors as his explanation (pp. 18-21, 84-87).Without question, biblical language, when it comes to God, seeks to accommodate human understanding, but cataloging all description of the person and actions of God as anthropomorphisms and analogies can prove problematic. For example, the issue of God’s eternality is given much attention in All That Is In God. Classical theism teaches that God’s act of creating is eternal, even though what He created is temporal. “Strictly speaking, creation appears with time, not in time†(p. 101). As the mutual theists wrestle with God in relationship with time they have taken at least three approaches that do not align with Dolezal’s position. Some mutual theists deny the timelessness of God; others see the timeless God becoming a temporal God who enters the time He has created; still others view God as both timeless and temporal. That is, the timeless God takes on new attributes for the purpose of relating to His temporal creatures (pp. 89-97, 103). Some natural theists believe that God can sovereignly choose to change not His essence, but His accidents (those which are not essential to His being) in order to relate to creation. One such example given by Scott Oliphint in a different book is that, prior to creation, God was not merciful because nothing existed that needed mercy. With the entry of sin, God now takes on the attribute of mercy (as well as justice). Thus, God can change in this way according to His sovereign choice, and yet not change ontologically (The Battles Belongs to the Lord, p.114). But to Dolezal such change denies immutability and thus God would cease to be God (pp. xiv, 28, 81, 89, 95-97). To the mutual theist God became merciful upon His act of creation. To the classical theist these features have always been part of His essence (p. 99).As can be seen, this theistic division over God is complicated. Yet Dolezal claims, “No less than true religion is at stake in the contest between theistic mutualism and classical Christian theism†(p. 104). Still the argument seems to be more about theological systems than biblical data—something Dolezal reluctantly admits (pp. 44, 63-69). It seems to me that something so important as to be foundational to true religion (Christianity) warrants clear teaching in Scripture and would not be left to deduction, reason and metaphysics. It is possible, even likely, that I am not smart enough to grasp the issues, but I cannot see how the mutualistic theism view threatens the nature and essence of the Godhead. But All That Is in God will certainly challenge and sharpen the reader’s understanding of God.Reviewed by Gary E. Gilley, Pastor-teacher Southern View Chapel.
Dolezal's book is a call to arms for Evangelicals and many among the Reformed. It is a call to return to Classical Theism and the confessions that came in the 17th century like the Westminster Confession of Faith. It is also a critique of contemporary theologians like Nash, Reymond, and apologists like John Frame.Ignore Frame's critique which is self-serving and only highlights his own ignorance in the field of historical theology and philosophical theology which is supposedly his bailiwick. Check out Mathison's critique of Frame's really bad review of Dolezal's much needed book.
James Dolezal is a very brilliant writer who takes the opposite views very seriously. He gives a good explanation of the opposing views and even goes as far as to give the best possible case for them; yet he brilliantly refutes them.It's interesting to note that for most of Christian history, theologians have accepted the classical view of God as a timelessly eternal, metaphysically simple ground of being -- not a particular being, but Being Itself. Whether or not you agree with the classical view of God, this is a very important thing to note when formulating your theology.
Convincing defense of Classical Christian Theism against the modern notions of Theistic Mutualism. Dolezal examines and refutes several different aspects of TM and explains the importance of maintaining the historic classical understanding of Theology Proper.
A must read for every serious theology student. The classical system of theology should not be as easily discarded as many would like. Dolezal brings back the categories and the theology of the fathers. This book will cause you to see wondrous things from God's word.
Over the last couple of decades there’s been laxity and error in the teaching of the Trinity, an abandonment—sometimes seemingly subtle—from classic Nicene orthodoxy, especially in Reformed-ish circles. This book is an necessary corrective and a must read for every leader and teacher in the church.My only criticism is that in its brevity it could have been more accessible, better edited and organized, move most of the footnotes to endnotes.
All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism, by James E. Dolezal PDF
All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism, by James E. Dolezal EPub
All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism, by James E. Dolezal Doc
All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism, by James E. Dolezal iBooks
All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism, by James E. Dolezal rtf
All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism, by James E. Dolezal Mobipocket
All That Is in God: Evangelical Theology and the Challenge of Classical Christian Theism, by James E. Dolezal Kindle
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar